Peter Hunt the BBC's Royal correspondent on Radio 4's Today Programme made a barbed comparison between the 'unelected' Queen and the Chinese president.
He said " The president of a single party state which shed its Imperial past more than a century ago was taking up temporary residence in the palace home of an unelected monarch".
And this from a journalist from the UNELECTED and bias BBC!!!!
This site highlights a series of issues that I have noticed in The BBC over the years - mostly related to the Institutional Bias in The BBC.
Wednesday, 21 October 2015
Saturday, 17 October 2015
# 367 - WAR - The EU versus Europe.
Most of the BBC's out put at the moment is NOT differentiating between the EU and Europe choosing to allow people to get away with saying we need to stay in Europe rather than the more toxic EU.
This is bias.
We are in Europe but do not have to be part of the EU. As the car sticker I once saw said " I love Europe but hate the EU!"
The main action is increasingly at the global top table and we are represented by an EU official. If we were free of the EU we could better represent ourselves.
The BBC's DNA is pro EU so they need to be watched VERY carefully over the next two years.
This is bias.
We are in Europe but do not have to be part of the EU. As the car sticker I once saw said " I love Europe but hate the EU!"
The main action is increasingly at the global top table and we are represented by an EU official. If we were free of the EU we could better represent ourselves.
The BBC's DNA is pro EU so they need to be watched VERY carefully over the next two years.
Thursday, 1 October 2015
# 366 - WAR - Update on my TV licence - Part four.
This is this my final update on my protest to not pay my TV licence, which I have not done since 2008 due to the BBC's bias.
After my house was searched, under a warrant, on the 28th May I knew that I would be taken to court as TV licencing had finally proved I did have a live TV. My aim, from then on in, was to try and reduce my fine to the absolute minimum.
My court appearance was at the North Somerset Magistrates court on 29th September where I pleaded guilty and submitted my 'Plea in Mitigation below'.
The three magistrates completely ignored my plea for a conditional discharge and fined me £805.
However as I had not paid my licence since 2008 I had saved over £1000 so on that basis it was a relatively happy ending.
Sadly the BBC's output is still bias and unless or until there is a MASS refusal to not pay the licence fee, including some high profile people, then individual protestors will be picked off by the Establishment and the 'System'.
As to hoping that there is even one MP with the guts to lead this campaign I suggest you don't hold your breath.
After my house was searched, under a warrant, on the 28th May I knew that I would be taken to court as TV licencing had finally proved I did have a live TV. My aim, from then on in, was to try and reduce my fine to the absolute minimum.
My court appearance was at the North Somerset Magistrates court on 29th September where I pleaded guilty and submitted my 'Plea in Mitigation below'.
The three magistrates completely ignored my plea for a conditional discharge and fined me £805.
However as I had not paid my licence since 2008 I had saved over £1000 so on that basis it was a relatively happy ending.
Sadly the BBC's output is still bias and unless or until there is a MASS refusal to not pay the licence fee, including some high profile people, then individual protestors will be picked off by the Establishment and the 'System'.
As to hoping that there is even one MP with the guts to lead this campaign I suggest you don't hold your breath.
Statement of Mitigation
First I would like to point out that
I now own a TV licence, having brought one on line on the 30th May,
copy attached, and I have done so as I intend to continue my protest in other
directions.
Second and importantly, I would like
to ask you to remember how much the public are reliant on you and our court
system, in general, to protect them from the over mighty ‘Establishment’ and
‘State’ to ensure they both do not abuse their power and privileges to the
detriment of us the people.
So I am here accused of not paying
my TV licence. This stance is a political protest because as a ‘customer’ of
the BBC I am not, nor are the rest of the public, receiving the un-biased
‘service’, we should get, as laid down in the Royal Charter of the BBC. In any
other walk of life the ‘customer’ is rightly protected by the law against
faulty goods or services and I contend the same should apply to the BBC. How
can I be charged for breaking the law when the BBC breaks its supply contract
with apparent impunity, broadcasting in a biased manner on a daily basis, which
is against its Royal Charter? That the non payment of my TV licence has been a
political protest is acknowledged by the attached letter of support from my
Member of Parliament.
That the BBC’s output is biased is
now increasingly an established fact and most recently endorsed by Roger Mosey,
in June this year, former head of BBC news adding to the long list of past BBC journalists
and officials, MPs ,official reports and the public who can all see the BBC is
bias.
Over the last 25 years I have been
noting, complaining and recording the BBC’s bias in three specific areas where
they clearly and provably do not report in a balanced way. These are their
reports that are pro climate change, pro the EU, form who they have received
millions of pounds in soft loans, and pro the left of British politics. My
analysis and records show that the BBC is institutionally bias.
The idea of being fined for a
genuine political protest is uncomfortable to me as a decent hard working
member of society who otherwise is of good character. Furthermore the idea that
the State enforces TV licensing as a criminal offence is also uncomfortable as
it criminalizes me an otherwise decent person. Also here in England we face the unfairness, of the recently
reported disparity, between the more lenient sentencing for this offence in Scotland . This
strengthens the case for decriminalising this offence and having it dealt with
in the civil courts as is currently being examined by the current government.
I purchased my licence through
gritted teeth despite the injustice and I hope you will consider this is a case
that you could seriously consider for a conditional discharge.
Thank you for listening and for your
consideration to my plea in mitigation.
T.N.Warry
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)