# 186 - WAR - It's always climate change at the BBC!

So on Radio 2 today Jeremy Vine had the obligatory spot as to whether our current wet weather was caused by climate change.

The sceptic was a pale imitation of a man who was incapable of challenging the blatant lies of the pro climate change person. This is a typical example of the BBC's pathetic attempt at balance.

The repeated lie that ALWAYS goes unchallenged is that the temperature is warming NOW.

THIS IS NOT TRUE.

In ' Heaven and Earth - global warming the science' by Ian Plimer he explains on page 86 that :-

"As with previous climate changes. the Late 20th Century Warming has not been a period of steady warming. As with previous climate changes, the evidence shows that the primary driver is a change in solar activity. There was warming from 1850-1940, cooling from 1940-1976, warming from 1976 - 1998 and cooling since 1998."

Listening to any broadcast on climate change on the BBC you would NEVER get to know this fact.

The laugh is that the BBC keeps telling us that they are always seeking to improve their broadcasting balance well they are not on climate change that is for sure.

I wonder if it is compulsory for BBC employees to sponsor a polar bear?!!*

* and I bet they aren't aware that polar bears have been so plentiful - their reported decline is yet another myth peddled by the watermelom BBC ( green on the outside and red on the inside!)

# 185 - WAR - 148 BBC 'Stars' avoiding tax.

148 BBC 'Stars' avoiding tax -  So leads the front page of the Daily Mail today. In essence the BBC top presenters and stars are paid through 'personal service companies' which has the effect of reducing their tax bill.

Do you recall the coverage the BBC gave to the Jimmy Carr tax dodge story.

HOW HYPOCRITICAL IS THAT?!

So once again the BBC shows its arrogance and proves there is one rule for them and another for the rest of us.

The BBC is quite simply not fit for purpose and needs a complete shake up and the only way to do this is to withdraw its funding via the TV licence and let it sink or swim as determined by the viewing public who could pay to view and any sponsorship they could get.

One key reform would be to tell the BBC to return to quality programme making and to leave news reporting well alone.

Of course we would need a government with the backbone to do this so for the time being the BBC's bias output will continue.

# 184 WAR - Mark Thompson admits BBC was bias.

The BBC’s coverage of the Arab Spring has been heavily criticised – by the corporation’s bosses. Head of news Helen Boaden admitted that her journalists got carried away with events and produced ‘over-excited’ reports. She told BBC Trust that in Libya, where reporters were 'embedded' with the rebels, they may have failed to give both sides of the story properly.

So says By Paul Revoir, Daily Mail - June 27, 2012

May have failed!!!!!!

Look at the coverage of Syria now. Are they again 'embedded' in with the rebels?

The BBC never seems to learn from its mistakes and is still bias to the left of centre of British politics.

Just consider how Mark Thompson admitted the BBC was left-wing in the Thatcher era.

So has anything changed???

# 183 - WAR - No one predicted the Euro crash!!!!

So on the Jeremy Vine radio show yesterday he came out with the unbelievable comment that NOBODY could have predicted the current Euro troubles!!!!!!

Such a comment just proves that  the BBC operates in the same bubble as the rest of the 'Establishment' bubble.

Well many great minds like Christopher Booker and Richard North predicted it and indeed I have been saying, from its conception, that a new country called the EU with such diverse members as Spain and Sweden and Germany and Greece could NEVER work.

The north of the UK often complains that our interest rates are set for the benefit of the SE so how the hell was the Euro ever to work?

So Jeremy Vine if you took your head out of your **** and smelt the coffee you would find plenty of real Eurosceptics who KNEW that the Euro would NEVER work.

 More bias from the BBC.

# 182 - WAR - Gay marriage.

The BBC was full of this story yesterday as the C of E was questioning the need for this as homosexuals already have Civil Ceremonies.

Despite this the BBC used phrases like "the C of E are against the efforts to LEGALISE Gay marriage."

No they are not they just say that marriage is between a man and a women with the purpose of procreation.

Gays can LEGALLY confirm their union with a Civil Ceremony yet some and it is only some want more.

A crayfish may want to be a lobster but it will ALWAYS be a crayfish - they are however both crustaceans.

# - 181 - WAR - Diamond Jubliee coverage.

So even the veteran leftie Stephen Fry says the BBC coverage was poor.

This is NO surprise as the BBC has consistently dumbed down their reporting over the years and is also basically Republican at heart.

This is yet another reason not to pay the BBC licence.

# 180 - WAR - 'Austerity'

At 0815 on Radio 4 Today's programme they interviewed an American Paul Krugman following his withering attack on the British government's economic policy.

When will the bias BBC interview somebody who advocates that austerity is in fact the only answer as I believe it is?

For example As Merryn Somerset Webb, Editor of Money Week, says this week :-

"There are 4 paths out of a financial crisis - rapid economic growth, massive default, high inflation (which increases nominal GDP and causes automatic deleveraging) and there is austerity.

The most common of which are infaltion and austerity with growth the least common. There is only one historical example of successful growth and that is the USA 1938 to 1943 and that didn't come from the best of sources.

So for those wondering how all this ends, history has given you something of a hint. You can't grow your way out of a financial crisis. You have to work your way out of it with austerity, inflation or a combination of both. Expect the later"

The BBC is bias in its coverage of our current economic problems favouring those who are against the cuts and austerity.

# 179 - WAR - 'Savage cuts!'

As Stephen Glover's headline in Saturday Mail's main article stated :-

" It's the daily mantra of the BBC: 'savage cuts' are bleeding Britain to death. In fact this is the great lie of our age - public spending is HIGHER than under Labour."

The BBC constantly allows Ed Milliband and Ed Balls to get away with their repeated mantra 'that the Tories are cutting to too fast and too far' and yet even basic analysis shows that the Coalition has cut very little and OVERALL government expenditure has gone up.

The bias BBC gave up reporting the real news along time ago and just panders to the left wing Establishment.

# 178 - WAR - BBC 2 - The Great Euro Crisis.

I watched the BBC2 show last night presented by Michael Portillo, the supposed Eurosceptic, and noticed that the BBC had clearly clipped his wings as the programme came out clearly for the Euro with no serious analysis that as a political project the 'Euro Elite' may wish it to work but it has NO chance.

The REAL choice is between a lot of pain now as the PIIGS are asked to leave the Euro and a great deal more pain if the Eurocrats keep trying to stick plasters over the cracks.

History teaches us that no central currency can EVER work without political union and it is clear the people of Europe won't allow that to happen without a big fight.

Things are going to get nasty before they get better - but don't expect the bias BBC to report such things.

# 177 - WAR - BBC - show bias in London Mayrol election coverage.

Below exract is taken from searchwatch.wordpress.com :-


Current polls for the London Mayoral elections are quite revealing. The major parties – Conservatives, Labour and Lib Dems are naturally standing candidates – as well as The Green Party, UKIP, BNP and a number of independents and small parties.
Firstly, bear in mind that by current polling figures, UKIP is expected to poll around 3% of the vote - around exactly that of the Greens.
So you’d expect that the BBC would be giving coverage to these parties more or less equally, right? I did some snuffling around using Google and found the following facts.

• Green Party candidate Jenny Jones received 280 mentions on the BBC website between 1st January and 30th April.
• Independent candidate Siobhan Benita received 106 mentions on the BBC website in the same timespan
• BNP candidate Carlos Cortigila received 63 mentions on the BBC website in the same timespan.
• UKIP candidate Lawrence Webb received just 58 mentions on the BBC website in the same timespan

However it is entirely in keeping with the BBC's Guardian view point that they would give more coverage to the 'socialist' Green Party over the 'rightwing' UKIP.