# 096 - WAR - BBC bias on AV vote.

Tim Luckhurst who is Professor of Journalism a the University of Kent writes in the 'Mail on Sunday' today and has this to say in para 10 of his article as to - Why the Liberal elite get it so spectacularly wrong.:-

The AV Referendum has given this country a forceful reminder of something many intelligent, hardworking adults in towns, villages and suburbs across the land have long known. Policies and proposals that are treated as pure wisdom inside soi-disant 'progressive' bastions such as university common rooms, small-circulation newspapers* and the BBC are anathema to millions of Britons. And this silent majority is, very reasonably, fed up with being told that it is wrong.

* By this I assume he is referring to the Guardian which is the Bible to all BBC types

# 095 - WAR - Yet more biasfrom our BBC!

I do often wonder when the institutional bias of the BBC will end? Year after year we get official reports commenting on the BBCs bias added to which retiring BBC journalists go to print to point out how they observed this bias at first hand. So two more examples form the Daily Mail this week. 1. Appearing on BBC London's News on Sunday , in African dress, Devon Thomas, who is described as Chair of the 30th Anniversary Brixton Retrospective, said the 1981 riots should be called an 'uprising', explaining: 'In the same way as the people of Egypt and Tunisia were being suppressed and rose up, that is what happened here'. The BBC allowed this pathetically self-deluding statement to be broadcast uncontested. 2. After monitoring coverage of the AV campaign the No2AV claims in a formal complaint to the BBC that the pro-AV movement are interviewed without the opposing view being expressed and points out the BBC has been seduced by the celebrity backers like Eddie Izzard and Kriss Akabusi. a BBC spokesman of course rejected this complaint. The BBC is bias to its core.

# 094 - WAR - The usual bias again.

1. Radio 4 World at 1 yesterday. The BBC reporter was interviewing an African Union spokesman about the situation in The Ivory Coast. The opening question was - "What the African Union was doing about it" The reply which was allowed to pass was " You know we are very concerned about what is happening!" Question not answered and no follow up - just imagine if this had been a Tory being interviewed would they have been treated so lightly!!! 2. Announcement on Radio 4 for a new programme told us that because a freedom of information request had revealed no street parties had been yet booked for the Royal Wedding the BBC would be hosting a programme on whether the Royal Family was still valued. Well of course the pro republican BBC never misses a trick to run down our monarchy. The BBC is SO bias they simply don't realise that virtually every broadcast is now bias in part or completely.

# 093 - WAR - Another BBC reporter finds his voice.

Isn't it typical that once a BBC reporter has his or her pension in the bag they suddenly find their voice. Another to join the line of BBC reporters who have seen the light is Mr Michael Buerk who claims the BBC is bias to its core and confesses that the Guardian is read as the BBC's Bible. If you don't like the BBC's bias output then don't pay your TV licence. I don't!

# 092 -WAR - BBC and Lonely Planet link.

I received this from a friend:- There was an item by Christina Odone in yesterday’s Telegraph to the effect that the magazine ‘Lonely Planet’ has given the UK a poor write-up, describing the economy as ‘dicey’ and the government as ‘devious’. This means that we will lose many tourist pounds in the coming years. Who owns the magazine? Only the good old BBC. The BBC is a disgrace and I urge people not to pay their TV licence.

# 091 - WAR - BBC 1 News at Ten.

I'm very aware that I don't post every day but I can assure you that doesn't mean the BBC hasn't been bias!

Every day they transmit on the radio or TV the BBC shows the bias that is embedded in its DNA.

Last night on the News at Ten 2 more examples.

1. An item on the cuts showed a group of ladies from Gloucestershire preparing to go to London today on a march over the cuts. Two points a. this is hardly a major news story and b. in any event the cuts aren't really cuts as I've explained before. This story was covered because the ladies in question were typical 'Tory' types and it gave the BBC a canace to poke the government in the ribs!

2. On Japan the main item was about a group of 'Green' types protesting about Nuclear power.
The 'nuclear issue' to the horrors in Japan is NOT the main part of the story but the BBC pushes it because the leftie BBC in its soul believes nuclear power BAD renewables GOOD.

If we only had renewables there wouldn't be enough power for TVs to work.............................

Hang on maybe they are not such a bad idea after all !!!

THE BBC IS BIAS ON A DAILY BASIS.

# 090 - WAR - BBC news hypes up nuclear scare in Japan.

The sloppy bias BBC hypes up nuclear scare in Japan without investigating the facts as on the link below taken form Richard North's blog EU Referendum.


http://http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2011/03/fukushima-for-dummies.html


The BBC increasingly dumbs downs to the lowest common denominator as if they believe to hell with the facts what is the popular line to push on this story that fits in with our own Guardian leaning views!

# 089 - WAR - Outgoing BBC Chairman admits mistakes.

So out going Chairman Sir Michael Lyons used his last major speech to launch a scathing attack on the Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand obscene phone call scandal as reported in the Daily Mail on Thursday 10th March.

Well Sir Michael that is TOO LITTLE TOO LATE.

#088 - WAR - BBC 1 News at Ten.

So no vitriol over Obama's U-turn over closing Guantanamo Bay.

Imagine if this U-turn had been made by a Republican instead of a Democrat?

The bias BBC loves Democrats and New Labourites and hates Republicans and Tories.

# 087-WAR - Newsnight BBC2 Mon 7th March.

Those of you that follow these things should know that that the final words in any interview are the ones remembered by the viewing public.

So on Newsnight last night the pro republican BBC finished its piece on Prince Andrew (my word aren't they just loving flogging this particular horse) finished with the words ................

The Prince and the paedophile.

Well the person concerned certainly had underage sex but by any serious definition is not a paedophile a point interestingly John Humphreys made on Radio 4 on the Today programme.that morning.

So why did the BBC still choose to push this line on Newsnight?

Because it has bias in its DNA that is why.